nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband
From: James Downs <egon () egon cc>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:02:21 -0700
On Aug 28, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I'm not following you here -- which party has the right of first refusal?
The incumbent companies (generally, a LEC or cable company) are able to refuse projects and also effectively prevent buildouts and upgrades from being done by a 3rd party. However, I have seen reports that in a few areas, municipalities are starting to win lawsuits against them (in apparently the long appeals process).
urban area receives no USF, and is not able to financially justify it evenwith a dense customer base.
That might apply to fiber, but even speed upgrades (Newer DSL services) are apparently subject to the same refusal process, but the rules are different across the country, too.
-j
Current thread:
- RE: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Frank Bulk (Sep 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband James Downs (Sep 07)