nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:13:38 +0100
Michael Dillon wrote: [..]
[..] The side effect of this is that it makes the network operator's tool sharper, and able to knock down single sites with a /32 ACL.
You actually mean a /128 in the case of IPv6, the /32 would be the complete ISP...
For a hosting provider, I would think that this strengthens the business case for IPv6.
and they can just use a single /64 for a single 'virtual webhost', then assign a 32 bit customer-id and have every customer have 2^32 sites, bingo. Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Michael Dillon (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Jeroen Massar (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Jeffrey Ollie (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Jeroen Massar (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Adrian Chadd (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Jack Bates (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Mark Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Jeroen Massar (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Ray Soucy (Oct 27)
- RE: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Brian Johnson (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Joel Jaeggli (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 could change things - Was: DMCA takedowns of networks Chris Adams (Oct 27)