nanog mailing list archives

Re: ingress filtering and multiple Internet conenctions


From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:05:07 -0400



Joe Greco wrote:


There's a problem:  I can validly emit a variety of other addresses, in
particular any address in 206.55.64.0/20 and some other networks.  I am
not "forging" packets if I emit 206.55.64.0/20-sourced addresses down a
Comcast pipe.

How many people realistically have this problem?  Well, potentially,
lots.  Anyone who uses a VPN could have a legitimate IP address on their
machine; because of BCP38 (and other security policy) it is common
for a VPN setup to forward Internet-bound traffic back to the VPN
server rather than directly out the Internet.  In some cases, one could
reasonably argue that this is undesirable.


I would like to take the opportunity to urge vendors of routers and firewalls to take extra special care and attention to make sure that The Right Thing can always happen whenever multiple egress services are employed.

This means that policy routing for network AND ALL locally generated traffic should be available and work as the operator intends it to.

Right now things still suck pretty hard, depending on what you are using.


Joe


Current thread: