nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP port blocking practice
From: "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)" <lyndon () orthanc ca>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:15:23 -0600
Rogers says they don't do that, and lots of other people seem to be able to use port 587 on Rogers (and other ISPs) without problems.
I'm in Calgary right now so I can't check the current behaviour, but as of June 1st it was still broken. Broken in the sense that any connection to port 587 would go through, but the AUTH lines in the EHLO response get deleted. They're obviously hijacking the connections through a broken proxy. And port 587 without AUTH is useless. As for outright blockage of port 587, I get this complaint from many of my clients while they are on the road. It seems hotels love to block it. --lyndon
Current thread:
- ISP port blocking practice Zhiyun Qian (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Antonio Querubin (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Ricky Beam (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Justin Shore (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Sean Donelan (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Joe Maimon (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Steve Bertrand (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Chris Boyd (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Justin Shore (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Joe Maimon (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Justin Shore (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Scott Howard (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Chris Boyd (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Jack Bates (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Steve Bertrand (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Michael Peddemors (Oct 23)