nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () kl net>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:10:51 -0400
TJ wrote:
In some cases different devices on a segment need a different default router (for default). This is the fundamentalThis capability is also defined, "more specific routes" - but no one encouraged any vendors that I know of to support it - so they don't. Big demand?
by "Default" I meant 0.0.0.0/0, not more specifics.
problem with RA's, they shotgun the entire segment.As opposed to a standard deployment, where the DHCP server provides the same information to every host on that link ... ???
Not always. The DHCP server can be aware of specific clients by mac address and give different options (and even pseudo-static IPs).DHCP server is not always running on a router so adding this functionality to routers won't help.
- Kevin
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Andy Davidson (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nathan Ward (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nathan Ward (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Kevin Loch (Oct 18)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 18)
- RE: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Kevin Loch (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Chuck Anderson (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nick Hilliard (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Matthew Kaufman (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mohacsi Janos (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David Conrad (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 21)