nanog mailing list archives
Re: 32-bit AS numbers
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 12:13:13 -0400
On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
Greg Hankins wrote:We also started a Wiki with content based on the presentation that hasmore updated information, including a current list of vendor support. If you see a vendor missing, let us know and we can update the list. Or better yet, create an account and add some content yourself :-). http://as4.cluepon.net/index.php/Main_PageWhile it's good to see support _finally_ in 2.2SX, I still don't see itin 12.2SR (for rsp720). It's almost like Cisco has no idea how many of these things are actually used on the Internet.
One can use the 23456 method in the interim, but I'd rather see everyone deploy 4-byte code. There have already been cases already of people putting 23456 in an as4_path inappropriately.
- Jared
Current thread:
- 32-bit AS numbers Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 09)
- RE: 32-bit AS numbers Azinger, Marla (Oct 09)
- Re: 32-bit AS numbers Greg Hankins (Oct 09)
- Re: 32-bit AS numbers Kevin Loch (Oct 09)
- Re: 32-bit AS numbers Jared Mauch (Oct 09)
- RE: 32-bit AS numbers Randy Epstein (Oct 09)
- RE: 32-bit AS numbers Larry May (Oct 09)
- Re: 32-bit AS numbers Matthew Palmer (Oct 10)
- Re: 32-bit AS numbers Ćukasz Bromirski (Oct 10)
- Re: 32-bit AS numbers Paolo Lucente (Oct 10)
- Re: 32-bit AS numbers Kevin Loch (Oct 09)