nanog mailing list archives
Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL
From: George Carey <george () montco net>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:30:03 -0400
We like PPPoE on the edge because we can use RADIUS to apply policy to the subscribers for bandwidth management, class-of-service, SNPs, etc. You probably have some of these features via your DSLAM, but we found it easier to do via RADIUS with a web based GUI for our provisioning folks. So if we need to snip someone's Internet and leave voice or VPN packets alone due to an abuse issue for example, we can apply the policy that references the appropriate ACL.
George
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL, (continued)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Saxon Jones (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL David E. Smith (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Walter Keen (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Mark Smith (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Nathan Ward (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Sean Donelan (Oct 29)
- RE: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Vince Mammoliti (Oct 29)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Jack Bates (Oct 29)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Ben Scott (Oct 29)
- RE: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Sean Donelan (Oct 30)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL George Carey (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 29)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Jack Bates (Oct 29)
- RE: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Frank Bulk - iName.com (Oct 30)
- RE: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Frank Bulk - iName.com (Oct 29)
- RE: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Sean Donelan (Oct 31)
- RE: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Frank Bulk - iName.com (Oct 31)