nanog mailing list archives
Re: What DNS Is Not
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:45:22 +0000
On Nov 27, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
Anytime this issue has been brought up in a public setting (here, slashdot, etc.) has resulted in terrible press and even corrective action.
Does anyone have any idea of the financial 'rewards' SPs who do this kind of thing reap from it? I'm wondering if the money is sufficient for the SPs in question to resist DNSSEC on the grounds that it will 'cost them revenue'. If it isn't, then what's the economic case for doing it in the first place? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice. -- H.L. Mencken
Current thread:
- Re: What DNS Is Not, (continued)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Mark Andrews (Nov 19)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jorge Amodio (Nov 19)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jorge Amodio (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Dan White (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Conrad (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Dan White (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Conrad (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Dan White (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Dobbins, Roland (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Eric Brunner-Williams (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Conrad (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not bmanning (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jorge Amodio (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Michael Peddemors (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Paul Vixie (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Conrad (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Paul Vixie (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Conrad (Nov 26)