nanog mailing list archives
Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:10:51 +0900
It turns out you can say any damn thing you want about peering since nobody has any facts.
not really. it's just that those with the facts have no reason to blab them and reasons not to do so. randy
Current thread:
- fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Niels Bakker (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Randy Bush (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering bmanning (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Paul Wall (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering William Allen Simpson (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 25)
- RE: [SPAM-HEADER] - Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses Rod Beck (Nov 25)