nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned?
From: Ross Vandegrift <ross () kallisti us>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:54:52 -0500
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:19:33PM +0100, Leland Vandervort wrote:
In this case, though I cannot see where the mismatch is given that the encapsulation, trunking (vlans allowed, etc.) and channel mode (LACP) are all configured identically across all ports and the channel itself. Just wondering if it's a left-over from before the VSS migration when the original trunks were two separate etherchannels and then migrated them "live" to MEC...
Check flow control between all of the elements. The only time I've seen this was inconsistent flow control settings between different media types on an F5 BIG-IP <-> 6500 bundle. show interfaces flowcontrol Ross -- Ross Vandegrift ross () kallisti us "If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter. If the going gets tough, the songs get tougher." --Woody Guthrie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Leland Vandervort (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Ross Vandegrift (Nov 24)
- Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Leland Vandervort (Nov 24)
- Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Ross Vandegrift (Nov 24)
- Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Leland Vandervort (Nov 24)
- Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Ross Vandegrift (Nov 24)