nanog mailing list archives
Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
From: Matthew Walster <matthew () walster org>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:14:27 +0000
2009/11/12 David Coulson <david () davidcoulson net>
You could route /32s within your L3 environment, or maybe even leverage something like VPLS - Not sure of any TOR-level switches that MPLS pseudowire a port into a VPLS cloud though.
Just to let you know - the Juniper EX4200 series only support a single label stack, and RSVP not LDP - plus they have a restricted BGP table size, so VPLS is out of the question. Matthew Walster
Current thread:
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR, (continued)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Chuck Anderson (Nov 18)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR David Coulson (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Jonathan Lassoff (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR David Coulson (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Ćukasz Bromirski (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Olof Kasselstrand (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Malte von dem Hagen (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Tore Anderson (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR gordon b slater (Nov 15)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Simon Leinen (Nov 15)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Matthew Walster (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Randy Bush (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Stefan (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR rodrick brown (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Joe Loiacono (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Cord MacLeod (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Shane Ronan (Nov 13)