nanog mailing list archives
Re: White House net security paper
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:23:43 +0800
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009, Randy Bush wrote:
and why do we think that throwing a jillion bodies at the problem is a useful approach?
No, but it does keep people employed. Sorry, I think I reached a new low in my "stabby, jaded" level when a past employer (a network consulting firm) blasted me for being "too efficient" at solving a problem. Adrian
Current thread:
- White House net security paper jamie rishaw (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper bmanning (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper marcin (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Adrian Chadd (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper bmanning (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Barney Wolff (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (May 31)