nanog mailing list archives
Re: IXP BGP timers (was: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers)
From: Andree Toonk <andree+nanog () toonk nl>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 20:33:52 +0200
Hi Chris, .-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at Mon, 25 May 2009, Chris Caputo wrote:
Would going below 60-180 without first discussing it with your peers, tend to piss them off?
60-180 is fairly conservative. 60-180 is the Cisco default I believe, however Junipers defaults are 30-90. I never pissed anyone off with that ;) Cheers, Andree
Current thread:
- Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers, (continued)
- Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Steve Bertrand (May 22)
- RE: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Ivan Pepelnjak (May 23)
- RE: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Frank Bulk (May 24)
- RE: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Ivan Pepelnjak (May 23)
- Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 23)
- Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Florian Weimer (May 25)
- Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Danny McPherson (May 25)
- Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Florian Weimer (May 25)
- IXP BGP timers (was: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers) Chris Caputo (May 25)
- Re: IXP BGP timers (was: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers) Andree Toonk (May 25)
- RE: IXP BGP timers (was: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers) John.Herbert (May 25)