Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

[Marshall Eubanks <tme () americafree tv>]

I use SSH tunnels for all mail, but I have had no problems with
DNS over Sprint EVD0 (the OP's issue).

Regards
Marshall

On May 14, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Dave Larter wrote:

> I agree, running monitoring from my laptop at home at
> nights/weekends/vacations/holidays... I need to use most of those  
> ports.
> My answer  was VNP/tunnel everything.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Levine [mailto:johnl () iecc com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 6:36 PM
> To: nanog () nanog org
> Cc: rs () seastrom com
> Subject: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed
> garden]
>
> > Dear Sprint EVDO people,
> >
> > Your man-in-the-middle hijacking of UDP/53 DNS queries against
> > nameservers that I choose to query from my laptop on Sprint EVDO is
> > not appreciated.  Even less appreciated is your complete blocking of
> > TCP/53 DNS queries.
>
> If I were an ISP, and I knew that approximately 99.9% of customer
> queries to random name servers was malware doing fake site phishing or
> misconfigured PCs that will work OK and avoid a support call if they
> answer the DNS query, with 0.1% being old weenies like us, I'd do what
> Sprint's doing, too.
>
> If you're aware of a mechanical way for them to tell the difference,
> we're all ears.
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl () iecc com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
> Dummies",
> Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com,
> ex-Mayor
> "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.