nanog mailing list archives
Re: UCEProtect Level 3
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy () druid net>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 16:29:19 -0400
On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:21:26 -0400 Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> wrote:
(a) This discussion should probably be happening someplace other than NANOG (spam-l or mailop, perhaps?), and
True. I didn't bring it up but this is my last post on the subject.
(b) If you feel that UCEProtect L3 paints with too broad a brush, then you're certainly free not to use it. I happen to agree with you on this particular level of this particular DNSBL for my particular applications, so I don't use it either. However: I'm aware of other folks who are using it quite effectively as *part* of a scoring system.
I don't use it but my problem was that other ISPs whose clients were trying to email my clients were using it. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy () druid net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
Current thread:
- [no subject] Rich Kulawiec (May 07)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 D'Arcy J.M. Cain (May 07)