nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP nexthop-self vs. EIGRP redistribution


From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:01:08 +0800

On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:33:30 am Pete Templin wrote:

Any NANOGers running an MPLS network and choosing instead
to redistribute the relevant connected routes from the
peering edge into their network (either via IGP or BGP),
thereby allowing label switching all the way to the PE
(and therefore out a particular interface)? Next-hop-self
seems to trigger penultimate hop popping, resulting in an
IP lookup on the PE.

Have you considered an explicit-null label value advertised 
by the LER?

Is your goal preservation of QoS information?

Cheers,

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Current thread: