nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:10:48 -0400
J. Oquendo wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Glen Turner wrote:William Allen Simpson wrote: A telecommunications carrier releasing a customer's details without their permission, to a non-investigatory third party, without a court order. Hmmm. It's certainly illegal here in Australia. And last I checked wasn't the US firm Hewlett Packard in trouble for hiring people to do just that?
Hey, bad quotation! I'm not from Australia. That's not my writing. Nor did I ever advocate releasing a customer's details -- to anybody. :-( I also disagree with your point about responsibilities of ISPs. Yes, it's true that Microsoft externalized its costs upon its customers. But only the ISPs are in a position to detect the abuse, and that's part of the business. Some of us take network security seriously.
Current thread:
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?, (continued)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Brett Charbeneau (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Joe Greco (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Mike Lewinski (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Peter Beckman (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Joe Greco (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? William Herrin (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Mike Lewinski (Mar 12)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? J. Oquendo (Mar 12)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? William Allen Simpson (Mar 12)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Brett Watson (Mar 12)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? JC Dill (Mar 12)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? N. Yaakov Ziskind (Mar 12)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Mark Andrews (Mar 12)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Ross (Mar 12)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Joe Greco (Mar 12)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Ross (Mar 13)