nanog mailing list archives
RE: SUP720 vs. SUP32
From: Bill Blackford <BBlackford () nwresd k12 or us>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:06:05 -0700
Thank you to everyone who offered advice. I thinks it's clearer what my path should be. Incidentally, I am using 7300/7200 based units with G1 RP and found that at 200M they start seeing 50% CPU load which is why I'm looking to go to the next step. Again, thanks to all -b -----Original Message----- From: Bill Blackford [mailto:BBlackford () nwresd k12 or us] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:18 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Anyone have any experience with SUP32? Please contact me off list. I'm trying to evaluate a lower-cost alternative to the 720-3bxl. I'm only pushing a few hundred megs of traffic, exchanging a few routes with less than 20 peers and don't see the need for a 720's worth of throughput in the near future. Can the 32 handle a full table? How does the MFSC2A compare to the MFSC3? V6 support? Thank you. -- Bill Blackford Senior Network Engineer my /home away from home
Current thread:
- SUP720 vs. SUP32 Bill Blackford (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Adrian Chadd (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Brian Feeny (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Brian Feeny (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Jon Lewis (Mar 11)
- RE: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Bill Blackford (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Adrian Chadd (Mar 11)
- RE: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Norrie, David (Mar 18)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Adrian Chadd (Mar 18)
- RE: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Holmes,David A (Mar 18)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Adrian Chadd (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Mark Tinka (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Larry Stites (Mar 11)
- RE: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Holmes,David A (Mar 11)