nanog mailing list archives
DPI or Flow Management
From: Francois Menard <francois () menards ca>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:51:19 -0500
The Coalition of Internet Service Providers has filed a substantial contribution at the CRTC stating:
1) The CRTC should forbid DPI, as it cannot be proven to be 98.5% effective at trapping P2P, such as to guarantee congestion relief
2) The CRTC should allow for other forms of traffic management by ISPs, such as Flow Management
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/public/partvii/2008/8646/c12_200815400/1029835.zip This is part of the public record at the following address: http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/8646/c12_200815400.htmThe world will see Canada taking head-on the issue of addressing the legitimacy of DEEP PACKET INSPECTION as a mean of properly managing an incumbent's network behind the unbundling/peering interface.
NANOG cannot pretend that this debate does not take place and remain silent on this.
Best regards, F. -- François D. Ménard francois () menards ca
Current thread:
- DPI or Flow Management Francois Menard (Mar 01)
- RE: DPI or Flow Management Lorell Hathcock (Mar 01)
- Re: DPI or Flow Management Francois Menard (Mar 01)
- Re: DPI or Flow Management Francois Menard (Mar 01)
- RE: DPI or Flow Management Howard C. Berkowitz (Mar 01)
- Re: DPI or Flow Management Francois Menard (Mar 01)
- Re: DPI or Flow Management Randy Bush (Mar 01)
- Re: DPI or Flow Management Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 01)
- Re: DPI or Flow Management Randy Bush (Mar 01)
- Re: DPI or Flow Management Roland Dobbins (Mar 01)
- Re: DPI or Flow Management Roland Dobbins (Mar 01)
- RE: DPI or Flow Management Lorell Hathcock (Mar 01)