nanog mailing list archives
Re: tor
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:22:53 +0530
Rod - you wouldnt qualify as an ISP - or even a "provider of an interactive computer service" to go by the language in 47 USC 230, by simply running a TOR exit node. On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Rod Beck<Rod.Beck () hiberniaatlantic com> wrote:
Richard, The question is how much ISPs should be responsible for the actions of their clients. My point is that is not obvious where you draw the line. I have yet to see anyone, including yourself, articulate a general principle (maybe it doesn't exist).
Current thread:
- RE: tor, (continued)
- Re: tor Brandon Galbraith (Jun 24)
- Re: tor Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 24)
- RE: tor Rod Beck (Jun 24)
- Re: tor Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 24)
- RE: tor Rod Beck (Jun 24)
- Re: tor Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 24)
- Re: tor Adrian Chadd (Jun 24)
- Re: tor Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 24)
- Re: tor Adrian Chadd (Jun 24)
- Re: tor Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 24)
- Re: common carriers, was tor John Levine (Jun 25)