nanog mailing list archives
Re: Wireless bridge
From: Neil Harris <neil () tonal clara co uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:28:12 +0100
Peter Boone wrote:
From: Michael Dillon [mailto:wavetossed () googlemail com](for example, after a good thunderstorm, the wireless link will bedown forat least 12 hours, but will fix itself eventually.Sounds like there are trees in the line of sight, and maybe they are getting leafier over the years. The only solution to that is to change the path if it is possible.The line of sight is all clear, no trees. Only one building along the way has a rooftop of similar height, but the antennas are extended far above the roofline. We have used a rifle scope to confirm line of sight is all clear at all angles.
Given that you have optical line of sight, and that your path length is only 800m, have you considered line-of-sight optical links for this application?
-- Neil
Current thread:
- RE: Wireless bridge, (continued)
- RE: Wireless bridge Peter Boone (Jun 18)
- RE: Wireless bridge Lyndon Nerenberg (Jun 18)
- RE: Wireless bridge Peter Boone (Jun 18)
- RE: Wireless bridge Peter Boone (Jun 18)
- Re: Wireless bridge Joel Jaeggli (Jun 18)
- RE: Wireless bridge Peter Boone (Jun 18)
- Re: Wireless bridge Curtis Maurand (Jun 18)
- Re: Wireless bridge Charles Wyble (Jun 18)
- RE: Wireless bridge Tim Huffman (Jun 18)
- RE: Wireless bridge John van Oppen (Jun 18)
- RE: Wireless bridge Bret Clark (Jun 18)
- Re: Wireless bridge Neil Harris (Jun 18)
- Re: Wireless bridge Chris Adams (Jun 18)
- Re: Wireless bridge Jay Hennigan (Jun 18)
- Re: Wireless bridge Joel Jaeggli (Jun 18)
- Re: Wireless bridge Bret Clark (Jun 19)
- Re: Wireless bridge Hugh Irvine (Jun 21)