nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cogent input
From: "John van Oppen" <john () vanoppen com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:31:24 -0700
NTT (2914) and GBLX (3549) both do native v6... most everyone else on the tier1 list does tunnels. :( There are some nice tier2 networks who do native v6, tiscali and he.net come to mind. -John -----Original Message----- From: Paul Timmins [mailto:paul () telcodata us] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:00 PM To: Justin Shore Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Cogent input
I hope at least some SPs make this commitment back in the states. I can't find any tier-1s that can provide us with native v6. Our tier-1
upstream has a best effort test program in place that uses ipv6ip tunnels. The other upstream says that they aren't making any public IPv6 plans yet. It's hard to push the migration to v6 along when native v6 providers aren't readily available.
GlobalCrossing told me today I can order native IPv6 anywhere on their network. Don't know if they count as Tier 1 on your list, though. VZB has given me tunnels for a while, hopefully they'll get their pMTU issue fixed so we can do more interesting things with it. -Paul
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent input, (continued)
- Re: Cogent input Marshall Eubanks (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Joel Jaeggli (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- Re: Cogent input Michael K. Smith (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input kris foster (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input David Temkin (Jun 17)
- Re: Cogent input Justin Shore (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Paul Timmins (Jun 11)
- RE: Cogent input John van Oppen (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Tore Anderson (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input sthaug (Jun 11)