nanog mailing list archives
Re: White House net security paper
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:41:50 +0900
As hire As. Bs hire Cs. Lots of Cs. this problem needs neurons, not battalions.this problem needs round-tuits, which Good Guys are consistently short of, but which Bad Guys always have as many of as they can find use for. a few battalions of B's and C's, if wisely deployed, could bridge that gap.
there is a reason Bs and Cs have spare round-tuits. fred brooks was no fool. os/360 taught some of us some lessons. batallions work in the infantry, or so i am told. this is rocket science. randy
Current thread:
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: White House net security paper Hank Nussbacher (Jun 01)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: White House net security paper Hank Nussbacher (Jun 01)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (Jun 01)
- Re: White House net security paper Jared Mauch (Jun 01)