nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:46:34 -0700
Shon Elliott wrote:
Jamie, Unfortunately, that's not easy with wireless backbones. The customers don't have their own "port". I also know for fact that 4chan is in the process of moving, so what you're seeing could just be that. Them moving.
This is definitely not "them moving":traceroute: Warning: img.4chan.org has multiple addresses; using 207.126.64.182
traceroute to img.4chan.org (207.126.64.182), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 67.118.62.1 207.264 ms 258.116 ms 174.721 ms 2 63.201.16.134 141.205 ms 46.683 ms 41.622 ms 3 * * * 4 * * * 5 * * * 6 * * * Traceroute from an ATT DSL account. ~Seth
Current thread:
- AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Joel Esler (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Seth Mattinen (Jul 26)
- Message not available
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. David Temkin (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. David Temkin (Jul 26)
- RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Tomas L. Byrnes (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Joel Esler (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Seth Mattinen (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. John Bambenek (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Jon Lewis (Jul 27)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. goemon (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. chris rollin (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. chris rollin (Jul 27)