nanog mailing list archives
Which is more efficient?
From: "Murphy, Jay, DOH" <Jay.Murphy () state nm us>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:56:11 -0700
All, In your humble opinion, which transmission method is more efficient, packet or cell? Granted a cell is a fixed length packet and an IP packet is variable length....would this necessarily only relate to a specific protocol, namely, cell in ATM, and IP in Ethernet or other types of domains....feedback highly welcomed. Trying to make a decision on the transport mode for cost, delay, jitter, ROI, etcetera. Jay Murphy IP Network Specialist NM Department of Health ITSD - IP Network Operations Santa Fé, New México 87502 Bus. Ph.: 505.827.2851 "We move the information that moves your world." Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including all attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited unless specifically provided under the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this message. -- This email has been scanned by the Sybari - Antigen Email System.
Current thread:
- Which is more efficient? Murphy, Jay, DOH (Jan 14)
- RE: Which is more efficient? Scott Berkman (Jan 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Which is more efficient? Josh Potter (Jan 14)
- Re: Which is more efficient? Joe Abley (Jan 15)
- Re: Which is more efficient? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 15)
- Re: Which is more efficient? Bill Stewart (Jan 15)