nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:45:32 -0500
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Soucy, Ray wrote:
We peer with Cogent. They are very competitive in terms of pricing.To be honest, Cogent has been pretty good to us. As long as you have a2nd peer (which it sounds like you do) for backup I'd say they're a pretty safe bet.
I think you mean s/peer/transit. -- TTFN, patrick
The only problem I've had with Cogent is that they're still not ready toroute IPv6.The whole "you get what you pay for" talk is nonsense in my book, you're paying top dollar with places like Sprint because they use the income tosubsidize their other efforts that are taking a loss. Ray Soucy Communications Specialist +1 (207) 561-3526 Communications and Network Services University of Maine System http://www.maine.edu/ -----Original Message----- From: Mike Bartz [mailto:mob () bartzfamily net] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:54 PM To: neal rauhauser Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0 I like the haiku! On a serious note, we are considering getting a connection from Cogent. We currently have connections to at&t, Level 3 and TW Telecom. The low cost and high number of peer AS number's seems appealing to us. Every carrier has its issues, so I don't know what to make of the apparent negativity that I am seeing in these haiku threads. I am looking for some first hand experiences to help me make this decision. Thanks for any assistance! Mike On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:59 PM, neal rauhauser <nrauhauser () gmail com> wrote:Cogent makes a mess My phone rings and rings Unfornicate this!-- Mike Bartz mob () bartzfamily net
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent (was the poetry thread), (continued)
- Re: Cogent (was the poetry thread) Martin List-Petersen (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent (was the poetry thread) Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent (was the poetry thread) Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0 Martin List-Petersen (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0 Seth Mattinen (Jan 12)
- RE: Cogent Haiku v2.0 John van Oppen (Jan 14)
- Cogent Considerations [was: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0] Adam Young (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Considerations [was: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0] Jim Shankland (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Considerations [was: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0] Brandon Galbraith (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0 Jack Bates (Jan 12)