nanog mailing list archives
Re:
From: Reese <reese () inkworkswell com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:34:25 -0500
I once had a legitimate difficulty and posted to this list as a direct result. As I was moderated at the time, my post was denied with the provided reason that it was not appropriate for this list. An attempt to identify the source ISP of a troublesome IP was not "appropriate" but the below (and etc.) is? Still, still, exercising undue discipline - unlike others. -- Scott Berkman wrote:
, drop, and roll? -----Original Message-----From: Aaron Imbrock [mailto:aimbrock () gmail com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:12 AMTo: NANOG () nanog orgSubject:Stop
Current thread:
- [no subject] Aaron Imbrock (Jan 11)
- Re: Nathan Malynn (Jan 11)
- Re: David Barak (Jan 12)
- Re: Wil Schultz (Jan 11)
- Re: Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 12)
- Re: Stephen Kratzer (Jan 12)
- RE: Scott Berkman (Jan 12)
- Re: RE: Ray Sanders (Jan 12)
- Re: Re: RE: Ken Simpson (Jan 12)
- RE: RE: Murphy, Jay, DOH (Jan 12)
- Re: Reese (Jan 12)
- Re: Jeremy L. Gaddis (Jan 12)
- Re: RE: Ray Sanders (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Alexander Harrowell (Jan 12)
- Re: Nathan Malynn (Jan 11)
- Re: Jim Popovitch (Jan 12)
- RE: Blake Pfankuch (Jan 12)