nanog mailing list archives
Re: question about BGP default routing
From: Jasper Bryant-Greene <jasper () unleash co nz>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:08:40 +1300
If it has a default route, 0.0.0.0/0, in its routing table, then yes, it is.
If it does not, then no, it is not. -jasper On 6/01/2009, at 1:05 PM, Kai Chen wrote:
Hi all I have a question: I see very few prefixes in a routing table and combining the prefixes does not cover addresses space, for example, {78.41.184.0/21, 91.103.239.0/24, 91.103.232.0/22, 82.138.64.0/23, 91.103.232.0/21, 77.95.71.0/24} are all prefixes I observed from a BGP speaking router, I am just asking is this router using a default routing for all the other destinations? Thanks a lot
-- Jasper Bryant-Greene Network Engineer, Unleash ddi: +64 3 978 1222 mob: +64 21 129 9458
Current thread:
- question about BGP default routing Kai Chen (Jan 05)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Jasper Bryant-Greene (Jan 05)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Edward B. DREGER (Jan 05)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Kai Chen (Jan 05)
- Re: question about BGP default routing chloe K (Jan 06)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Edward B. DREGER (Jan 06)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Edward B. DREGER (Jan 06)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Kai Chen (Jan 05)