nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:45:47 -0600
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Who says the IPv6 solutions need to be better than IPv4?
I think that IPv6 solutions will automatically be better than IPv4 based on the switch to multicast for handling things. That being said, I haven't seen the normal IPv4 solutions migrated to IPv6 as of yet in the products I currently use.
I honestly believe that a majority of the debate is mute, in that IPv6 *has* some L2 security stuff written up (which I don't believe they did with IPv4). Once vendors implement them, things will be on par. The only issue I've heard of is that DHCPv6 doesn't support handing out a router, which is in draft (and DHCPv6 is very clear that it only covers a base set and additional RFCs will be necessary for more options). RA should still be the switch that says SLAAC or DHCPv6, even if it isn't used for the option of routing.
As said elsewhere in the thread, vendors will do what they feel they need to do, with or without an RFC. IOS, for example, doesn't support IA_TA or IA_NA at this time. It's in the DHCPv6 spec, though.
-Jack
Current thread:
- Greedy Routing, (continued)
- Greedy Routing Rod Beck (Feb 18)
- Re: Greedy Routing Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 18)
- RE: Greedy Routing Deepak Jain (Feb 18)
- RE: Greedy Routing Jake Mertel (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Matthew Moyle-Croft (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Matthew Moyle-Croft (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Barak (Feb 18)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nick Hilliard (Feb 19)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Leen Besselink (Feb 17)