![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 Confusion
From: "TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:35:38 -0500
How does IPv6 addressing work?
Short version: 2000::/3 The currently active global unicast pool RIRx::/12 IANA (by default) assigns /12s to RIRs RIRx:ISPx::/32 RIRs (by default) assign /32s to ISPs RIRx:ISPx:ORGx::/48 ISPs (by default) assign /48s to enterprises (/56s to homes) RIRx:ISPx:ORGx:VLAN::/64 Enterprises 'subnet' their allocation into /64s (debate over [/126 | /127] to P2P links)
I know it's been hashed and rehashed but several orgs I am associated with
are
about to ask for their allocations from ARIN and we are all realizing we
don't
really know how the network / subnet structure trickles down from the edge
to
the host. We really don't have a firm grasp of all of this as there seems
to
be multiple options regarding how many addresses should be assigned to a
host,
if the MAC address should be included in the address or if that is just for auto-configuration purposes or what the heck the deal is. There are a lot
of
clear statements out there and a lot that are clear as mud. Unfortunately, even when trying to analyze which RFC superseded another. Can I just
subnet it Use the IETF/RFC web interface, clearly shows what RFCs where deprecated by, or deprecate/update, a given doc: e.g. - http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2461 ... has an obsoleted by, updated by, and obsoletes ...
all like IPv4 but with room to grow or is each host really going to need
its
own /84 or something? I can't see why hosts would need any more addresses
than
today but maybe I'm missing something because a lot of addressing models
sure
allow for a huge number of unique addresses per host. My buddy and I are about to go to Barnes and Noble, not having and luck
with
standard internet media but then we realized... how will we know if any of that is really what we are looking for either?
Depends what you are looking for, and possibly your HW vendor of choice. <<SNIP>>
Current thread:
- IPv6 Confusion Carl Rosevear (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mohacsi Janos (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Fred Baker (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Scott Howard (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Owen DeLong (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Carl Rosevear (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Owen DeLong (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Smith (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Oberman (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Carl Rosevear (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mohacsi Janos (Feb 17)