nanog mailing list archives
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:01:50 +1300
On 3/02/2009, at 12:17 PM, Johnny Eriksson wrote:
Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren () free fr>:Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses thanRFC1918 gives you.Use IPv6.For an IPv4 scalability test? Interesting idea... Apart from the basic incompability here, my opinion of IPv6 is that itjust gives you 2^96 more addresses to repeat all the old mistakes with.
Not quite.. 2^96 = 79228162514264337593543950336 2^128-2^32 = 340282366920938463463374607427473244160 -- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space, (continued)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skywing (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Barak (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Johnny Eriksson (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Hallgren (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Barak (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Johnny Eriksson (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Hallgren (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Randy Bush (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Anthony Roberts (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 03)
- IPv6 space (was: RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space ) Deepak Jain (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Trey Darley (Feb 03)