nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 delivery model to end customers
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:15:42 -0500
On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:01 AM, TJ wrote:
My pleasure, now everyone - feel free to ring up your localsales/support rep and "encourage" their product to implement this ...please!What about "DHCPv6 / DHCPV6-PD" sniffing (and using that info to create L3filter rules in L2 devices), is a standard needed or is it obvious to vendors how to implement it?An analogy to "DHCP Guard" - yes, please do encourage them to also do this.(And an RFC might not be a bad idea ... ) While we are at it - MLD Snooping should (IMHO) be a switch's default
s/MLD/MLD v2/ Marshall
behavior as well!
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Pekka Savola (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Soucy, Ray (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mark Tinka (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Soucy, Ray (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Feb 10)
- Re: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Marshall Eubanks (Feb 10)
- Re: FW: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mark Tinka (Feb 09)