nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network equipments process utilization
From: Adam Armstrong <lists () memetic org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:51:58 +0000
Elmar K. Bins wrote:
hank () efes iucc ac il (Hank Nussbacher) wrote:- slow-CPU boxes like everything Cisco with SUPs, since the CPU load _always_ jumps to 100% for short periods of time - BGP needs something calculated ;-) I get interested whenever CPU load _stays_ highYeah - Cisco would like to know why as well: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac50/ac207/crc_new/university/RFP/rfp07026.htmlI know ;-) But: This is not a churn problem, it's a problem of slow CPUs in allegedly big-and-fast boxes. I'd like a NPE-G2 blade for my 76's, as RP. Still, this is getting off-topic.
The MSFC4 in the RSP720 has a 1.2GHz 8548 PPC whereas the NPE-G2 has a 1.67GHz 7448 PPC.
I'd guess the performance isn't all that far apart, especially as the MSFC4's processor isn't doing any forwarding.
adam.
Current thread:
- Network equipments process utilization 정치영 (Feb 09)
- Re: Network equipments process utilization Elmar K. Bins (Feb 10)
- Re: Network equipments process utilization Hank Nussbacher (Feb 10)
- Re: Network equipments process utilization Elmar K. Bins (Feb 10)
- Re: Network equipments process utilization Adam Armstrong (Feb 10)
- Re: Network equipments process utilization Elmar K. Bins (Feb 10)
- Re: Network equipments process utilization Hank Nussbacher (Feb 10)
- Re: Network equipments process utilization Elmar K. Bins (Feb 10)