nanog mailing list archives
Re: DPI or Flow Management
From: Steve Bertrand <steve () ibctech ca>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:02:19 -0500
Francois Menard wrote:
The Coalition of Internet Service Providers has filed a substantial contribution at the CRTC stating: 1) The CRTC should forbid DPI, as it cannot be proven to be 98.5% effective at trapping P2P, such as to guarantee congestion relief 2) The CRTC should allow for other forms of traffic management by ISPs, such as Flow Management http://www.crtc.gc.ca/public/partvii/2008/8646/c12_200815400/1029835.zip This is part of the public record at the following address: http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/8646/c12_200815400.htm The world will see Canada taking head-on the issue of addressing the legitimacy of DEEP PACKET INSPECTION as a mean of properly managing an incumbent's network behind the unbundling/peering interface. NANOG cannot pretend that this debate does not take place and remain silent on this.
Francios; Are you responding directly to my post via an automated filter, or am I the only one seeing the hijacking of this thread? Either way, great! I thought that I'd state that I forgot to mention in my original post that I was considering running HSRP (vrrp) on my core routers, for the access-layer clients who are not multi-homed. Given my setup, does RFC3768 at the 'core' make sense? Steve
Current thread:
- ISP network re-design feedback requested Steve Bertrand (Feb 28)
- Message not available
- Re: DPI or Flow Management Steve Bertrand (Feb 28)
- Message not available