nanog mailing list archives
Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:39:09 -0500
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org> wrote:
Should US based networks be willing to route RIPE "ASSIGNED PA" space customers provide?
this is an interesting question, which when I worked for an ISP I always wondered about. In fact, when we'd see solely based US customers asking for this sort of thing it often meant shortly there after we'd see complaints of TOS/AUP violations. There doesn't seem to be a hard/fast rule about this though (the 'is it right to permit this activity'), but there sure is quite a bit of it going on, eh? -Chris
Current thread:
- Article on spammers and their infrastructure Phil Regnauld (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Tony Finch (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Jon Lewis (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Christopher Morrow (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Joel Jaeggli (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Jon Lewis (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Christopher Morrow (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Leo Vegoda (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Jon Lewis (Dec 24)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Leo Vegoda (Dec 24)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Christopher Morrow (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Tony Finch (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 22)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Paul Ferguson (Dec 22)