nanog mailing list archives
Re: Linux shaping packet loss
From: Michael Holstein <michael.holstein () csuohio edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:00:08 -0500
What's good for really cheap gigabit, redundant, high throughput
Well .. I'd say you could pick any two of those and come up with a list .. but we use Packeteer (now owned by Bluecoat) to great success. It fails the first requirement miserably, IMHO, though. I've also used these in a MDU setting, but certainly not at gigabit speeds : http://www.netequalizer.com/nda.htm They claim models are available up to 5gbps ($11k). 1gbps is ~$9k. Cheers, Michael Holstein Cleveland State University
Current thread:
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss, (continued)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Brielle Bruns (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Michael Holstein (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Chris (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Simon Horman (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss gordon b slater (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Bazy (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss gordon b slater (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss gordon b slater (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Nickola Kolev (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Chris (Dec 10)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Michael Holstein (Dec 10)