nanog mailing list archives
Re: random DNS, was news from Google
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 7 Dec 2009 22:29:12 -0000
Will be interesting to see if ISPs respond to a large scale thing like this taking hold by blocking UDP/TCP 53 like many now do with tcp/25 (albeit for other reasons). Therein lies the problem with some of the "net neturality" arguments .. there's a big difference between "doing it because it causes a problem for others", and "doing it because it robs me of revenue opportunities".
I do hear of ISPs blocking requests to random offsite DNS servers. For most consumer PCs, that's more likely to be a zombie doing DNS hijacking than anything legitimate. If they happen also to block 8.8.8.8 that's just an incidental side benefit. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: news from Google, (continued)
- Re: news from Google Steve Meuse (Dec 07)
- Re: news from Google Chris Hills (Dec 05)
- Re: news from Google Henry Linneweh (Dec 05)
- Re: news from Google Tony Finch (Dec 08)
- Re: news from Google Chris Hills (Dec 08)
- Re: news from Google Bret Clark (Dec 03)
- RE: news from Google Xavier Banchon (Dec 03)
- Re: news from Google Hank Nussbacher (Dec 03)
- Re: news from Google Michael Holstein (Dec 07)
- Re: random DNS, was news from Google John Levine (Dec 07)
- Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style) Jared Mauch (Dec 07)
- Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style) Paul Timmins (Dec 07)
- Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style) Brielle Bruns (Dec 07)
- Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style) Jared Mauch (Dec 07)
- Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 07)