nanog mailing list archives
Re: cisco.com
From: Jason Lixfeld <jason () lixfeld ca>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:27:42 -0400
Well, Cisco *did* EoS/EoL BGP last week. I guess there really wasn't all that much industry traction on whatever protocol they decided to replace it with.
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2009-July/062646.html ;p On 4-Aug-09, at 9:45 AM, Aaron Millisor wrote:
Not sure the ETA but the network that the address for cisco.com resolves to (198.133.219.0/24) is no longer in BGP.-- ----------------------------------------------------- Aaron Millisor R. Benjamin Kessler wrote:Hey Gang - I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net (including downforeveryoneorjustme.com); any ideas on the cause and ETR?Thanks, Ben
Current thread:
- RE: cisco.com, (continued)
- RE: cisco.com Scott Wolfe (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Marshall Eubanks (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Bruce Horth (Aug 04)
- RE: cisco.com Hiers, David (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com sjk (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Marc Manthey (Aug 04)
- RE: cisco.com Jonathan Bayles (Aug 04)
- RE: cisco.com Justin Krejci (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Gaurav Taparia (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Aaron Millisor (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Jason Lixfeld (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com hank (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Justin M. Streiner (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Jason Lixfeld (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com German Martinez (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Giuseppe Spanò - Videopiù Srl (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Michal Krsek (Aug 04)
- RE: cisco.com Matthew Huff (Aug 04)
- Re: cisco.com Myke Lyons (Aug 04)
- RE: cisco.com Matthew Huff (Aug 04)