nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:52:18 +0900
Am I alone in my view that BGP is _far_ more simple and straight-forward than OSPF
this is a very telling statement in a number of ways. that ospf has become exceedingly complex, and all that results thereof. that both are known for their complexity. randy
Current thread:
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP, (continued)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Ivan Pepelnjak (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Roland Dobbins (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Philip Smith (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 20)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Ivan Pepelnjak (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Gary T. Giesen (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Steve Bertrand (Aug 20)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Ivan Pepelnjak (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 20)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Ivan Pepelnjak (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Daniel Roesen (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Gary T. Giesen (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Randy Bush (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Jack Bates (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Daniel Roesen (Aug 21)