nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Addressing Help
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:09:00 +0900
Isn't it great that we never have to worry about IPv4 style addressing issues (e.g. sizing the subnet, manually configuring the addresses, or having an "address configuration server" attached to the segment to manage addresses) when dealing with Ethernet in the last 27 years or so? Why is that, and what can we learn from that?
among many other things, that autoconf sucks in significant instances randy
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Addressing Help, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 Addressing Help TJ (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Jeroen Massar (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help David Freedman (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Randy Bush (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Larry Blunk (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Randy Bush (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Jon Lewis (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help David Freedman (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Mark Smith (Aug 15)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Mark Smith (Aug 15)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Jack Bates (Aug 17)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Mark Andrews (Aug 14)
- RE: IPv6 Addressing Help David Freedman (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help steve ulrich (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help Jeroen Massar (Aug 14)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Help William Herrin (Aug 14)