nanog mailing list archives

Re: Wow, just when you though big government was someone else's problem


From: John Bambenek <bambenek () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:22:28 -0500

Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Jeff Young <young () jsyoung net> wrote:
This comes from Lauren Weinstein's list and it's worth a read.
It's a bill introduced into legislation, who knows where and when
and if it will become law but, wow.

http://lauren.vortex.com/Cyber-S-2009.pdf

Relying on Lauren to hear about cybersecurity related news is like
relying on Fox News for an accurate picture of what Obama is doing.
Ignore.
Personally, I always read press releases from the White House and take that as absolute fact. You can't trust people to give you accurate information if they aren't completely subservient to the agenda.

I'll just give you a teaser:

SEC. 9. SECURE DOMAIN NAME ADDRESSING SYSTEM.

There's more than enough government supported work going on that
promotes DNSSEC, in case you're not aware?

Other pearls of wisdom:  the government will license all "cyber" security
folks and you don't work on government or "any network deemed by
the president to be critical infrastructure" without one.

Do you by any chance get to go work on sensitive government networks
without, say, a security clearance?

--srs




Current thread: