RE: Google Over IPV6

["TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>]

Heh ... perhaps I mis-used "using".

My apologies, let me be more explicit:
        You do not connect to Google's services directly using Ethernet or
ATM addressing/reachability, except to (cough) "tunnel" IP(v*) over those
media.
                Same for frame relay, token ring, etc.etc.etc.

Better? :)


Now if you made it IPv6 over IPv4 over IPv4+GRE+IPsec over Ethernet over
MPLS we would be talking FUN.  And someone would be having WAY to much free
time!
/TJ
PS - Yes, you win $5 - to be paid in Internet Dollars, and you didn't even
need to go on strike to get them.   (/southpark)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Abley [mailto:jabley () hopcount ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:44 AM
> To: TJ
> Cc: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: Google Over IPV6
>
>
> On 1 Apr 2009, at 11:19, TJ wrote:
>
> > You do not (or, atleast I do not :)) have the option of connecting to
> > Google "over" MPLS, Ethernet, etc.
>
> r1.owls#show arp | inc 198.32.245.6
> Internet  198.32.245.6            2   001f.128e.56f2  ARPA
> FastEthernet0/1
> r1.owls#show ipv6 neighbors | inc 2001:478:245:1::6
> 2001:478:245:1::6                           0 001f.128e.56f2  REACH
> Fa0/1
> r1.owls#
>
> That's the router in my house connecting to Google using IPv4/IPv6 over
> ethernet over ATM. Do I win $5? :-)
>
>
> Joe