nanog mailing list archives
RE: Network SLA
From: "Holmes,David A" <dholmes () mwdh2o com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:10:21 -0700
From the network operators' standpoint, designing a network that
operates at 50% utilization (without using ponderous QoS schemes) assumes that there is no random queuing behavior in the network that can result in dropped packets and large variations in packet arrival jitter. An active measurement tool such as BRIX gathers empirical data for packet drops and jitter from which accurate predictions about network behavior can be made. Think of active measurement tools as a means of implementing a scientific approach to determining network behavior.
From the users' standpoint, BRIX can be used to validate the service
providers' contractual SLA, and provide empirical data to support SLA violation penalties. -----Original Message----- From: Saqib Ilyas [mailto:msaqib () gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 4:11 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Network SLA Hmmm. Good point. Perhaps the Internet traffic gets only a small share of the link capacity and the rest is reserved for corporate clients' VPN traffic etc. I was thinking more along the lines of corporate SLAs, not for Internet traffic. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Rod Beck <Rod.Beck () hiberniaatlantic com>wrote:
Congestion is more common than you think. And by the way, if
congestion
is not a problem in Pakistan, then why is the VoIP qualit so poor? :) Roderick S. Beck Director of European Sales Hibernia Atlantic 13-15, rue Sedaine, 75011 Paris http://www.hiberniaatlantic.com Wireless: 1-212-444-8829. French Landline: 33+1+4355+8224 French Wireless: 33-6-14-33-48-97. AOL Messenger: GlobalBandwidth rod.beck () hiberniaatlantic com rodbeck () erols com ``Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.''
Albert
Einstein. -----Original Message----- From: Saqib Ilyas [mailto:msaqib () gmail com <msaqib () gmail com>] Sent: Wed 4/15/2009 11:22 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Network SLA I talked to the NOC personnel at a small (compared to North American standards) ISP in Pakistan. They said that their core links are
operating
at less than 50% utilization most of the time. Under such conditions, violating SLA conditions in the core is unlikely. If such is also the case with
most
service providers in the North America as well, then why would they
even
use active measurement such as iPerf or BRIX or Cisco IP SLAs before
signing an
SLA? Thanks and best regards On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Saqib Ilyas <msaqib () gmail com> wrote:Greetings I am curious to know about any tools/techniques that a service
provider
uses to assess an SLA before signing it. That is to say, how does an administrator know if he/she can meet what he is promising. Is it
based
onexperience? Are there commonly used tools for this? Thanks and best regards -- Muhammad Saqib Ilyas PhD Student, Computer Science and Engineering Lahore University of Management Sciences-- Muhammad Saqib Ilyas PhD Student, Computer Science and Engineering Lahore University of Management Sciences
-- Muhammad Saqib Ilyas PhD Student, Computer Science and Engineering Lahore University of Management Sciences
Current thread:
- Re: Network SLA Saqib Ilyas (Apr 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Network SLA Saqib Ilyas (Apr 15)
- Re: Network SLA Martin Hannigan (Apr 15)
- RE: Network SLA Holmes,David A (Apr 15)
- Re: Network SLA Saqib Ilyas (Apr 15)
- Message not available