nanog mailing list archives
Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ?
From: "Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia)" <kin-wei.lee () hp com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:48:32 +0000
Hi all, in most of the existing 2G/2.5G mobile PS-core (Packet Switch) networks have Gi segment (interface between GGSN & IP Router/firewall). Due to the IP address constraint, operator usually do NAT on the Gi firewall to NAT the private IP to public IP in the past. Looking at the traffic pattern and user access behaviour, does it make sense to have firewall between the GGSN & Public Internet if the public IP addresses are sufficient to cater for mobile subscribers? Especially with 3G/UMTS/HSPA or even LTE in the future. Please share your thought and thanks in advance :) Regards, Steven Lee
Current thread:
- Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia) (Apr 09)
- Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 09)
- Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Roland Dobbins (Apr 09)
- Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Roland Dobbins (Apr 09)
- Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Eugeniu Patrascu (Apr 10)
- Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Alexander Harrowell (Apr 09)
- Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Roland Dobbins (Apr 09)
- Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Mike Dimayuga (Apr 09)
- Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Rubens Kuhl (Apr 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Mike Tancsa (Apr 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ? Skywing (Apr 09)