RE: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream

[Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>]

On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Skywing wrote:
> Putting things in the automated bogon feeds (e.g. Team Cymru) that are not strictly bogons (unallocated addresses) is 
> likely to very quickly erode trust in those services, if that is what you are suggesting.

We all want a "really really bad stuff" BGP feed for anyone who wants it, 
but the Internet is not ready for that.

        Gadi.


> - S
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 09:26
> To: nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org>
> Subject: Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream
>
>
> On Tuesday 16 September 2008 23:36:20 *Hobbit* wrote:
> >    you expect them to apply a null route?
> >
> > Well, I *have* been talking somewhat idealistically here and
> > there with this crop of questions, but frankly I thought in the
> > 2 or 3 years I was ignoring the list that the NETWORK OPERATORS
> > ostensibly in custody of the intertubes would have pulled things
> > together a little better and grown enough of a pair to firmly
> > state "this crap stops here and now" and make it happen.
>
> :-)  Speaking as an observer only, and not as someone who, other than at my
> own edge, could make a significant impact on the result.
>
> Seems to me getting that IP space on a bogon list could be enough to make a
> serious dent.