nanog mailing list archives
Re: New Intercage upstream
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:55:01 -0400
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:33 EDT, Lamar Owen said:
peers carries great weight (as it should, of course). But, in section IV(I) PIE makes a connection guarantee. That is their right to do, obviously, but
Playing devil's advocate here - it guarantees a connection, but does it also guarantee that PIE won't null-route any of the customer's packets trying to leave PIE's network at an upstream peer/transit point? :) However, if Gadi's claim that they don't seem to have any clients other than Intercage is right, I'm sure the correct term for the connection guarantee is "bulletproof"...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- New Intercage upstream marcus.sachs (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Bill Woodcock (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream William Hamilton (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Bill Woodcock (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream William Hamilton (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Christian Koch (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream William Hamilton (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Bill Woodcock (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Lamar Owen (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Gadi Evron (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Christopher Morrow (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Paul Wall (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Pekka Savola (Sep 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New Intercage upstream Paul Ferguson (Sep 12)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Andrew Clover (Sep 13)
- Re: New Intercage upstream Gadi Evron (Sep 13)