![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions
From: "jim deleskie" <deleskie () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:38:42 -0300
This is an awesome thread... in the 18mts I tested F10 vs Juniper vs Cisco I need see my Cisco sales rep push this hard :) On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Jo Rhett <jrhett () netconsonance com> wrote:
On Aug 26, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:Bottom line, in a few years, everyone carrying full tables with F10 gear will probably need to upgrade all of their line cards to quad-cam.Why is this statement being limited to F10? It appears to be true of every vendor. But why quad-cam? The dual-cam cards have indecent amounts of storage. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
Current thread:
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions, (continued)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Sep 04)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions jim deleskie (Sep 04)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Jo Rhett (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Paul Wall (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Joel Jaeggli (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Jo Rhett (Sep 04)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Paul Wall (Sep 04)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Jo Rhett (Sep 04)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Paul Wall (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions jim deleskie (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Aaron Glenn (Sep 03)