nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google's PUE
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:31:00 +0100
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Personally, I am glad GOOG is posting their PUE. People who talk about additional metrics are correct - more information is better. But some information is better than none, and PUE is a perfectly valid data point. It doesn't measure everything, but that does not make it completely useless. Given Google's history of .. shall we say reticence regarding internal information, it's nice to see SOMETHING from them. So let's encourage it and see if they release more.
Also relevant is this paper: "Power provisioning for a warehouse-sized computer" http://research.google.com/archive/power_provisioning.pdf Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ GERMAN BIGHT: WEST 5 OR 6 VEERING NORTHWEST 6 TO GALE 8, BACKING SOUTHWEST 5 OR 6 LATER. ROUGH OR VERY ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Current thread:
- Re: Google's PUE, (continued)
- Re: Google's PUE Andy Grosser (Oct 02)
- Re: Google's PUE Jean-François Mezei (Oct 01)
- RE: Google's PUE Alex Rubenstein (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Daniel Golding (Oct 02)
- Re: Google's PUE Deepak Jain (Oct 01)
- RE: Google's PUE Alex Rubenstein (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Jeff Shultz (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Brian Raaen (Oct 02)
- Re: Google's PUE Daniel Golding (Oct 02)
- Re: Google's PUE Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 02)
- Re: Google's PUE Tony Finch (Oct 03)
- Re: Google's PUE Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 02)
- RE: Google's PUE Skywing (Oct 01)