nanog mailing list archives

Re: Another driver for v6?


From: Matthew Ford <ford () isoc org>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:39:06 +0000

On 30/10/08 07:10, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, David W. Hankins wrote:

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 06:32:31PM -0400, Steven King wrote:
Does anyone see any benefits to beginning a small deployment of IPv6 now
even if its just for internal usage?

It is almost lunacy to deploy IPv6 in a customer-facing sense (note
for example Google's choice to put its AAAA on a separate FQDN).  At

Could you please elaborate on this point? My data presented
<http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/v6ops/v6ops.2008/msg01582.html> indicates that there are very very few (the longer I collected the data, the better the ratio got) who cannot properly fetch a resource that has A/AAAA.

Your stats (which are very interesting btw, thanks for doing the work) suggest that the number of clients that would make use of the AAAA record for a dual-stack service is about the same as the number of clients that would fail in the event that both A and AAAA were present. That's not exactly an incentive to content providers is it?

IPv6: It's kind of like storing dry food in preparation for the
     apocalypse.

If you actually KNOW the apocalypse is coming (but not when), this is correct.

The end is nigh - http://penrose.uk6x.com/


Mat



Current thread: