nanog mailing list archives
Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:23:25 +1300
On 18/10/2008, at 12:18 AM, Michael Simpson wrote:
On 10/16/08, Truman Boyes <truman () suspicious org> wrote:It's a good point that you brought up.Even though we already have IPv6 P2P (Nathan's post explains this in more detail), it would still be quite interesting to provide IPv6 as a higherclass of traffic within service provider networks.As long as none of your ipv6 traffic transits across anything from British Telecom as it is not supported on their 21st Century Network<http://aaisp.blogspot.com/2008/10/bts-21st-century-network-apparently-not.html >
Yeah, except Teredo and 6to4 solve that problem for us today and are enabled by default on Vista and are used by p2p applications.
Next. -- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Scott Doty (Oct 14)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Niall Donegan (Oct 14)
- RE: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Skywing (Oct 14)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Nathan Ward (Oct 14)
- RE: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Tomas L. Byrnes (Oct 14)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Mark Newton (Oct 14)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Truman Boyes (Oct 16)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Michael Simpson (Oct 17)
- RE: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster michael.dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Nathan Ward (Oct 17)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Michael Simpson (Oct 17)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Niall Donegan (Oct 14)